Pasadena city college– Pasadena, California.
International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2026, 18(02), 492-505
Article DOI: 10.30574/ijsra.2026.18.2.0282
Received on 06 January 2026; revised on 12 February 2026; accepted on 14 February 2026
The research article presents an overall comparative study of multivariate GARCH M-GARCH in portfolio risk management, where three prevailing specifications VEC, CCC and DCC models are considered. We take daily closing prices of four major assets of the year 2018 through to 2023; S&P 500, NASDAQ-100, gold futures, and US Treasury Bonds, to estimate conditional variances, covariances, and dynamic correlations using maximum likelihood estimation. The descriptive statistics indicate that volatility is highly concentrated in clustering and time varying across assets with NASDAQ having the highest volatility (2.08) and significant negative skewness that shows non-normal returns. Comparison on models based on information criteria indicates that the Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC) specification has better performance with less computation need, fewer 8 parameters as compared to 21 (VEC) and greater log-likelihood with high improvement (164.67 units). Adequate model specification is shown through diagnostic testing using Ljung-Box test and ARCH-LM tests. Empirical results indicate that the volatility persistence (alpha + - 0 = 0.98) and the dynamics of high correlation (beta = 0.9321) are high which indicates long-memory properties and mean-reverting behavior which does not support constant correlation assumptions.
Multivariate GARCH; Dynamic Conditional Correlation; Portfolio Risk Management; Volatility Clustering; Value-at-Risk
Get Your e Certificate of Publication using below link
Preview Article PDF
Taekyung Park. Multivariate GARCH Models for Portfolio Risk Management: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2026, 18(02), 492-505. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2026.18.2.0282.
Copyright © 2026 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0







